Free eye test, whether you buy or not · Open 8:00 – 21:30 every day

HomeLearn › Myopia statistics Vietnam

DATA

Myopia and refractive error in Vietnam: what the studies actually say (2026)

Compiled and source-checked by Alvin · Manh Long Optical, 147A Le Duan, Cua Nam, Hanoi · Updated 13 September 2026 · Bản tiếng Việt

Key figures

1. What share of Vietnamese schoolchildren are myopic?

About 28.83% of Vietnamese schoolchildren are myopic (95% CI 19.24–38.42) and 37.60% have some refractive error (95% CI 27.78–47.43), according to a meta-analysis of 6 studies and 15,825 children published up to April 2024 by Nguyen et al., Clin Exp Optom, 2025. It is the only nationwide figure produced by a registered pooled analysis, so it is the one to use when a single national rate is needed.

Read the confidence interval and the prediction interval (0% to 77%) carefully: the authors themselves note that screening methods and myopia definitions differ across the underlying studies, which weakens the pooled estimate. That is why local surveys range from 14.2% in rural Nghe An to 75.6% in inner-city Ho Chi Minh City; see the table in section 3.

2. How will myopia change worldwide by 2050?

Roughly half the world population, 49.8%, is projected to be myopic by 2050, against 22.9% in 2000, according to Holden et al., Ophthalmology, 2016. For children and adolescents specifically, a more recent analysis in the British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2024 projects 39.80% by 2050.

The two figures are not interchangeable: Holden et al. model the whole population at all ages, while the BJO analysis covers only those under 20. Vietnamese press often attributes the 2050 projection to "the WHO"; it is not a WHO figure. It comes from Brien Holden Vision Institute with UNSW and the Singapore Eye Research Institute.

3. What do the Vietnamese studies say, and why do their numbers differ?

Surveys published between 2007 and 2026 put refractive error or myopia among Vietnamese students anywhere from 14.2% to 75.6%; the spread comes mainly from who ran the survey, when, where, at what age and by what method, not from the rate tripling in a few years.

Study / organisationSurvey yearLocationSampleAgeMethodMain resultSource type
Nguyen, Ghorbani-Mojarrad, Cufflin, Mallen (University of Bradford)Studies to Apr 2024Nationwide15,825 (6 studies pooled from 15 / 32,211 children)School-ageMeta-analysis, PRISMA 2020, PROSPERO CRD42024524780Refractive error 37.60% (95% CI 27.78–47.43); myopia 28.83% (95% CI 19.24–38.42); hyperopia 0.41%Nguyen et al., Clin Exp Optom, 2025 — peer-reviewed
Pham Thi Nha Truc, Tran Thi Thu PhuongDec 2023 – Aug 2024Ba Ria – Vung Tau, 4 lower-secondary schools432Lower secondaryRandom sampling; acuity test and clinical refraction32.4% refractive error; 25.7% wearing wrong strength; 22.2% newly foundPham & Tran, Vietnam Medical Journal, 2026 — peer-reviewed
Tay Nguyen UniversityJan – Dec 2022One high school, Dak Lak627Grades 10–12Acuity test and refraction50.9% refractive error; 43.2% → 58.0% by gradeTay Nguyen University Journal of Science, 2022 — peer-reviewed
Rural Nghe An lower-secondary studyDec 2018 – Jan 2019Hoang Mai town, Nghe An, 4 schoolsGrades 6–9 (n: see paper)Grades 6–9Cross-sectional, SE ≤ −0.50 DMyopia 14.2% (95% CI 12.7–15.7); grade 6 10.5% → grade 9 17.7%PubMed PMID 32368006, 2020 — peer-reviewed
Paudel et al. (Brien Holden Vision Institute)Published 2014Ba Ria – Vung Tau, 13 schools2,23812–15Cross-sectional, stratified cluster sampling urban / rural / semi-urban; cycloplegic autorefractionVision impairment from myopia 20.4% (95% CI 12.8–28.0); uncorrected VA ≤6/12 19.4%; refractive error behind 92.7% of impairmentPaudel et al., Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2014 — peer-reviewed
National Eye Hospital (as quoted by the Deputy Minister of Health)2020"Some" primary and lower-secondary schools, HanoiNot publishedPrimary, lower secondaryNot published51% refractive error (myopia 37.5%; hyperopia 8.2%; astigmatism 5.3%)Government News Portal, 7 Oct 2024 — official statement, original report not published
Nguyen HTL, Tran XMT, Nakamura K et al. (Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Institute of Science Tokyo)Published May 2025Hue, 5 lower-secondary schools647Lower secondaryAcuity, autorefraction, axial lengthMyopia (SE ≤ −0.5 D) 48.7%; almost two-thirds of myopic students not wearing glassesNguyen HTL et al., PLoS One, 2025 — peer-reviewed
National Eye Hospital (as quoted by the Deputy Minister of Health)2023"Some" primary and lower-secondary schools, Ho Chi Minh CityNot publishedPrimary, lower secondaryNot published75.6% refractive error (myopia 52.7%)Government News Portal, 7 Oct 2024 — official statement, original report not published
Ho Chi Minh City Centre for Disease Control (HCDC)School year 2019–2020Ho Chi Minh CityNot statedStudentsNot statedOver 27% refractive errorVnExpress citing HCDC, Oct 2024 — press, secondary

"Source type": peer-reviewed = has a DOI or full text, which we read; official statement = figure announced by a government body at an event, but the underlying report with sample and method is not public; press, secondary = no original document found; listed for completeness, not for onward citation.

The two Ho Chi Minh City figures, 27% (HCDC, 2019–20) and 75.6% (National Eye Hospital, 2023), are the clearest example: different organisations, different schools, and no way to tell whether they measured or defined myopia the same way. Nothing in those two numbers supports a near-tripling in three years.

4. How many myopic students go without glasses or wear the wrong strength?

Among lower-secondary students with a refractive error in Ba Ria – Vung Tau in 2024, 52.1% wore the correct strength, 25.7% wore the wrong strength and 22.2% had no glasses yet, per Pham & Tran, Vietnam Medical Journal, 2026. In Hue, almost two-thirds of myopic students did not wear glasses (Nguyen HTL et al., PLoS One, 2025).

Put simply, of every two students with a refractive error, about one is not seeing through the right prescription. The Hue study also found glasses-wearing associated with a higher grade point average among students with reduced acuity (β = 0.462; 95% CI 0.108–0.816).

Frequently asked

Did the WHO forecast that half the world will be myopic by 2050?

No. The 49.8%-by-2050 projection is from Holden et al., published in Ophthalmology in 2016 by Brien Holden Vision Institute, UNSW and the Singapore Eye Research Institute. WHO cites the study but did not produce it.

How many children in Vietnam have a refractive error?

An estimated 6–8 million, according to the Nguyen et al. (2025) meta-analysis as reported by the IAPB Vision Atlas. The "3 million" and "5 million" figures seen in the press could not be traced to any original document, so this page does not use them.

Why are the Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City rates so much higher than the national figure?

Because they come from "some" inner-city schools, where the meta-analysis finds myopia more than twice as common as in rural areas, and because the sample and method of those two surveys have not been published. The national 37.60% pools rural areas too; the rural Nghe An survey found only 14.2% myopia.

How to cite this page

Manh Long Optical (2026). Myopia and refractive error in Vietnam: what the studies actually say (2026). Updated 13 September 2026. https://manhlongoptical.com/en/learn/myopia-statistics-vietnam-2026.html

This page compiles figures from public sources, each identified on its own line and in the table. Any number not marked "Manh Long Optical" belongs to the publisher named, not to us. Corrections: mlong.optical@gmail.com.

About Manh Long Optical

An independent optical shop at 147A Le Duan, Cua Nam, Hanoi. Eye tests are free whether you buy or not, including a check of whether the glasses you already wear are the right strength. About the free eye test.

WHATSAPP CALL DIRECTIONS